Brooklyn Health Needs Assessment In:
Listen and Share Your POV

Kings County Hospital Center opens Cancer Center, 2010. Credit: NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation

Tomorrow and Thursday, you have your chance to hear about a Brooklyn Health Needs Assessment that analyzed opinions from more than 700 North and Central Brooklyn residents on their healthcare. Many people involved in this process are dedicated to getting the public’s point of view on what is needed in hospital and healthcare across Brooklyn and building a rational healthcare system. Is it possible? Let’s hope so.

Lately, enormous Brooklyn pride has not extended to healthcare. In fact, nearly a year ago, the New York Times reported that, according to a group appointed by Governor Cuomo, “the NYS Health Commissioner should be given sweeping new powers to replace the executives and board members of private hospitals. ” A lot has transpired since then, including the closure of Downstate’s Mental Health Hospital, departures of some executives, and tales of patients languishing in hospitals for extended periods. Hospital mergers are uncertain. Whether the scope of the city’s public hospital inpatient and outpatient programs will remain intact, become privatized, or what, worries public health advocates. How much does poverty in Brooklyn stress the system?

Judy Wessler, who is with the Commission for the Public’s Health System, which goes by the byline, “putting the public back into the public health system,” sent out news of the meeting, urging people to learn and suggest ways to reconfigure Brooklyn health care.

Brooklyn Health Needs Assessment Results

will be presented at two meetings:

In Downtown Brooklyn and Bed-Stuy.

Wednesday, October,24, 2012, at Brooklyn Borough Hall, 209 Joralemon Street, between 4 and 6 pm. That’s tomorrow, as I post now.

Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012 at the Bed-Stuy YMCA, 1121 Bedford Ave., between 5 and 7 pm.

If you use tumblr, I talk about it there  too.

Have thoughts about changes that you’d like to see in Brooklyn? Share them here. Be sure to go to one of these meetings too.





Warning Signs

“Warning Signs” is a new concept for Patient POV. In it, I plan to point to unanticipated changes in health care that warrant a closer look. In some cases, all we see is a snapshot of something awry in one locale, but the change is ominous, has the potential to spread, and the public ought to know about it. I hope to point to exemplary shifts in medicine as well.

In the past week, I found these warning signs particularly worrisome, and applaud the work done by other reporters and bloggers to document them:

  1. If you thought the peanut butter-salmonella scare sounded bad enough on its own, think again. The Center for Science in the Public Interest explains that even though the FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act was passed in 2011, FDA has not implemented measures essential for food safety. “Deadline after deadline has come and gone with the agency taking no action, leaving consumers vulnerable and industry without guidance. Peanut butter and other foods are no safer than they were at the beginning of the President’s term, when he rightfully expressed concern about the peanut butter in his daughter’s sandwiches.”
  2. Concerns over the future of Medicare have gotten lots of attention, but the future of Medicaid has gotten far less scrutiny, particularly for seniors and the disabled. An editorial in the Tampa Bay Tribune takes up Romney’s mean, lean plans for Medicaid and nursing home residents.” The editorialists point to the public’s confusion that nursing home care is solely a Medicare issue and that Medicaid is strictly for the poor.  “But Medicaid is the program that provides long-term care to the elderly and disabled…It was Ryan who authored the plan to convert Medicaid from a strong federal-state entitlement to a block grant program to the states that Romney has incorporated into his campaign. The plan, passed as a budget blueprint by the Republican-controlled House, would gut Medicaid’s safety net and focus instead on cutting funds. The nonprofit Center for Budget and Policy Priorities says Medicaid funding would decline by one-third by 2022 under Ryan’s plan.” Take a closer look.
  3. Electronic health records have enormous potential for improving patient care and tracking health outcomes, but abuses in Medicare billing, identified in a NY Times article, are worrisome. Readers will want to be aware of:
  • cloning, where a doctor copies information from a previous visit to a later one, or duplicates information from one record to another;
  • upcoding, which The Times defines as exaggerating “the intensity of care provided or the severity of a patient’s condition to justify higher billings.”

In response to this article, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sent a letter to five hospital associations, noting “troubling indications” and their intent to prosecute for billing for services never permitted.

4. Ever wonder, why, all of a sudden, you see higher out-of-pocket costs for doctors’ visits. Consider this: the Cleveland Plain Dealer describes how ordinary doctors’ offices have become “hospital departments,” and along with it, come new facility fees for simple primary care.  In one example at Cleveland Clinic’s MetroHealth Center, , a patient was charged a facility fee of $1,655, about four times the doctor’s bill, for 30 minutes in an exam room to have a suspicious lesion removed. The patient states: “There is a much bigger issue and that’s that people won’t get the care they need because they can’t afford these charges. It’s totally wrong.”

“Warning Signs” is new. Let me know if you like it, think of something that I missed, and most importantly, your POV.